Not
only do older people marrying younger spouses make
them the envy of onlookers but it may have serious
implications on Required Minimum Distributions (RMD)
from their retirement accounts and the value of their
retirement portfolios. In this article I calculate
the RMD for a retiree with a spouse the same age and
also with a spouse more than 10 years younger. I demonstrate
the effect the age difference between spouses has
on the size of the retiree's RMDs and in turn
on the value of her overall retirement portfolio over
five years of distributions.
For retirement account owners, the required minimum
distribution rules apply to traditional IRAs, SEPs
and SIMPLE IRAs, qualified plans and 403b accounts.
The RMD rules do not apply to the owners of Roth IRA
owners, but they do apply to the beneficiaries of
Roth IRA.
Distributions from retirement accounts have a required
beginning date (RBD) which is April 1 of the year
following the year one reaches age 70.5. Failure to
take a RMD results in penalty of 50 percent of that
portion which is not taken. If the account owner is
still employed at age 70.5 and he participates in
a qualified plan or 403(b) account, he may be allowed
to defer the start of his RMDs until after retirement.
This doesn't apply, however, if the retirement
account holder owns at least 5 percent of the business
that adopted the plan.
The formula
for calculating RMDs is as follows.
Prior year end (Dec
31) total of the Tax Deferred Retirement Account
Divided by
The number from the
Uniform Lifetime Table based upon attained age in
the current year
Equals
The RMD for the Tax
Deferred Account in the current year
The regulations on RMDs allow
the retirement plan owner to recalculate the required
minimum distributions each year. Normally, a 70 year-old
retiree uses the factor (27.4) on the Uniform Lifetime
Table (Table 1) and divides it into his tax deferred
retirement account portfolio balance from the prior
December 31st. The following year he must calculate
a RMD using the prior December 31st retirement account
balance divided by the factor for age 71 (26.5).
The exception for using the
Uniform Lifetime Table is when the spouse is the beneficiary
of the retirement account and is more than 10 years
younger than the participant. In this instance the
Joint Life Expectancy Table (Table 2) is used which
increases the factor that is divided into the IRA
account balance and reduces the required withdrawal.
Example
For the example it is assumed a man is turning age
70.5 in 2005, has a spouse who is also 70 years old,
and a total balance of $500,000 in his IRA retirement
portfolio on December 31, 2004. Further it is assumed
the portfolio grows at 5 percent per year through
2009. The retiree draws his first RMD on December
31, 2005 and will draw four more RMDs on the end of
the each of the next four years. Figure 1 and Figure
2 show the size of each of the RMDs and the value
of the portfolio at the end of each of the five years.
The RMD for 2005 in Figure 1 is calculated by dividing
the 2004 year end balance of $500,000 by the factor
from the Lifetime Uniform Table, 27.4. The portfolio
value at year end is calculated by growing the 2004
year end balance by 5 percent and then subtracting
the RMD of 2005. The RMD and year end balance for
the rest of the years is done in the same fashion.
Figure 2 calculations are also done this way except
the factors from the Joint Life and Survivor Expectancy
Table are used.
| Figure
1 |
| Uniform |
Year |
Age
of Spouse |
Table
Factor |
RMD |
Portfolio
Value Year End |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2005 |
70 |
27.4 |
$18,248 |
$506,752 |
| 2006 |
71 |
26.5 |
$19,123 |
$512,967 |
| 2007 |
72 |
25.6 |
$20,038 |
$518,577 |
| 2008 |
73 |
24.7 |
$20,995 |
$523,511 |
| 2009 |
74 |
23.8 |
$21,996 |
$527,961 |
| |
|
|
Total $100,400 |
|
| Figure
2 |
| Joint |
Year |
Age
of Spouse |
Table
Factor |
RMD |
Portfolio
Value Year End |
| |
|
|
|
|
| 2005 |
55 |
31.1 |
$16,077 |
$508,923 |
| 2006 |
56 |
30.1 |
$16,907 |
$517,461 |
| 2007 |
57 |
29.2 |
$17,721 |
$525,613 |
| 2008 |
58 |
28.3 |
$18,573 |
$533,321 |
| 2009 |
59 |
27.4 |
$19,464 |
$540,523 |
| |
|
|
Total $88.742 |
|
The ending retirement balances in
2009 using the Uniform Lifetime Table is over $12,000
greater than the balances using the Joint Life and
Survivorship Expectancy Table when comparing Figures
1 and 2. The RMD is over $2,000 greater each year
for the Figure 1 RMDs compared to Figure 2 RMDs. Having
a younger spouse can pay off for retirees enabling
them to take lower required minimum distributions
from their retirement plans and to build larger retirement
account balances after age 70.5.
| Table
1 – Uniform Lifetime Table |
Retiree's
Age |
|
Factor |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
27.4 |
|
|
71 |
|
26.5 |
|
|
72 |
|
25.6 |
|
|
73 |
|
24.7 |
|
|
74 |
|
23.8 |
|
|
| Table
2 – Joint Life and Survivor Expectancy
Table |
| Spouse's
Age |
Retiree's
Age |
55 |
56 |
57 |
58 |
59 |
70 |
31.1 |
30.3 |
29.5 |
28.8 |
28.1 |
71 |
30.9 |
30.1 |
29.4 |
28.6 |
27.9 |
72 |
30.8 |
30.1 |
29.2 |
28.4 |
27.9 |
73 |
30.6 |
30.0 |
29.1 |
28.3 |
27.5 |
74 |
30.5 |
29.8 |
28.9 |
28.1 |
27.4 |
Kevin J.
Sigler, PhD, CFP
Cameron School of Business
University of North Carolina - Wilmington
Wilmington, NC 28403
Email: siglerk@uncwil.edu
Phone: 910-962-3605
Kevin Sigler is
a Professor of Finance at the University of North
Carolina Wilmington in the Department of Economics
and Finance in the Cameron School of Business. He
received a Ph.D. in finance from the University of
Nebraska. |